An article from EIR's Washington correspondent Bill Jones, published by China’s CGTN Network, drew the direct line from the British intelligence four-year drive to force President Donald Trump out of office — in which Roger Stone was a target — back to the same intelligence agencies’ imprisonment and attempted elimination of Lyndon LaRouche. Stone, himself, who said he had directly learned of President Reagan’s interest in LaRouche’s ideas while managing Reagan’s 1980 campaign in New Hampshire, was well aware of the connection. He understood that President Trump has been getting “the LaRouche treatment” from the British and U.S. intelligence agencies — it is now important that the President’s patriotic backers understand it, and that influential people in China understand it also.
Lyndon LaRouche’s “great development project” idea of the Eurasian Land-Bridge in 1989 and Helga Zepp-LaRouche’s work leading to today’s New Silk Road and World Land-Bridge infrastructure platform, are very well known in China. What needs to be understood is that LaRouche was vilified and persecuted “six ways from Sunday” at the initiative of British and U.S. intelligence agencies, because he designed great-power summit agreements for development, among America and Russia and China and India. In the 1980s he was working directly — and also conducting a back-channel — for a U.S.-Soviet agreement to end Mutually Assured (nuclear) Destruction, with a new era of spread of laser-like technologies both in anti-missile defense, and in industrial development of underdeveloped nations.
As Jones wrote in CGTN, “Stone himself has often referred to the classic case of the operations against now-deceased economist and many times presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche. LaRouche had been instrumental in getting President Reagan to implement what was designated the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).
LaRouche -– and President Reagan –- saw such a proposal as a peace plan ... President Reagan’s view was the same.
“If a defense were to be found against nuclear weapons, the technology would only be developed in cooperation with the Soviet Union. While the historical record portrays the SDI as a move to give the U.S. a strategic advantage over the Soviets, a recently declassified National Security Directive, NSDD-172, signed by Reagan himself in 1985, clearly indicates that the President was prepared to enter negotiations with the Soviet Union to build a mutual or complementary defense system to protect BOTH nations.”
That’s when Robert Mueller was assigned to prosecute Lyndon LaRouche.
LaRouche’s method was to find the compelling common-interest rationale for a summit negotiation process between apparent great-power adversaries, which was also to the benefit of the rest of the world’s nations. That was at least the strong intention of President Trump, coming into office in 2016, toward both Russia and China. A British-instigated war party has fought to destroy it by a coup against him. Now that summit process MUST get started over the next 60 days, to deal with the huge problems of uncontrolled pandemic, economic breakdown in scores of nations, the clearly growing threat of a nuclear arms race, and nuclear war.
And the turnaround that could come from such a “September surprise” summit process, is also the one way that President Trump could be re-elected. He, and the Presidents of Russia and China, need to understand what their common adversary is, and why over 40 years it tried to destroy the name, the works, the person of Lyndon LaRouche.
