A series of investigative pieces by The Guardian into the Queen’s powers over legislation, begs the question whether it is exercised to promote Prince Philip and Prince Charles’ green genocide agenda. The Guardian reports on the Queen’s right to give her consent to legislation before it is approved by parliament, allowing her to review whether royal prerogative is violated.
While the royals describe this process as “a long-established convention that the Queen is asked by parliament to provide consent … for the debating of bills which would affect the prerogative or interests of the crown,” it often appears to be abused to protect the Queen’s financial interests, especially when it comes to her wealth. As reported in the briefing, she intervened to exempt herself from being subjected to a financial transparency law passed in the 1970s.
The Guardian has compiled a list of no fewer than 1,062 pieces of legislation which the Queen has reviewed since her crowning in 1952.
While many of the exceptions she sought could be justified by her status as head of state, others cannot. For example the government gave the Queen an exemption in a 2006 act to prevent the mistreatment of animals, stopping inspectors from entering her private estates.
Commenting on this state of affairs in an op-ed in the Guardian, Adam Tucker, a senior lecturer in constitutional law at the University of Liverpool, wrote, “This degree of involvement in the legislative process is unjustifiable. It is a serious constitutional mistake that has survived only through being obscured. In the famous formulation, the Queen in our constitutional monarchy has the rights ‘to be consulted, to advise and to warn.’ It is now clear that the process of Queen’s consent goes beyond the boundaries of legitimate involvement set by those rights.”
Why the Guardian is pursuing this investigation is not clear, but the question to be asked is whether the Royals have been involved in vetting legislation for compliance with Charles’s green genocide agenda.
