Skip to content

Supreme Court Upholds Arizona Voting Law Restrictions — a Blow Against the Vote Fraud

The Supreme Court has voted 6-3 to uphold the new voting law in Arizona, ruling that there is no racist intent. This is a significant blow to the vote-fraud apparatus nationally, which has tried to institutionalize unrestricted mail-in voting and the right for people to gather up absentee ballots and deliver them to the polls. The Democrats in the Congress are even trying to impose this nationally, in contradiction to the Constitution’s explicit placement of voting procedures under the powers of the individual states.

The Court ruled that the two contested issues — that voters must vote in their appointed districts, and that, other than mailmen and election officials, only official caregivers can deliver ballots for others, and only for the person in their care — are in no way “racist” or discriminatory.

This will affect similar efforts in 47 other states to take steps against vote fraud. The “big lie” peddled in every news outlet and by the Democrats — that any talk of vote fraud in the 2020 election is a “big lie” — is thus put under closer inspection. The media, of course, call the decision a “blow to voting rights,” apparently believing that minorities are less able to find out where they are supposed to vote or to vote in person or to mail in their own absentee ballot.