Ukraine’s Mad President Volodomyr Zelensky and many U.S. Congress members have been charging that Russia is a terrorist state. The U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice, Beth Van Schaack, however, disagrees. She explains that Russia does not meet the U.S. definition of “State Sponsor of Terrorism.” Yesterday, the European Union (EU) adopted a resolution calling Russia a “state sponsor of terrorism,” but Van Schaak said that it does not fit the U.S. definition. She said that Washington is “exploring other potential designations” that would permit additional sanctions on Moscow, but she said that was unnecessary, because the U.S. is “utilizing our sanctions to an incredible degree.”
US and Canada Paid
U.S. Is Working at Refining the Definition of "State Sponsor of Terrorism"
About the author
Latest articles
Related coverage
-
In-Depth
White House Lighting a Crypto Fuse Under Volatile Treasury Market
-
In-Depth
The Battle in the United States: LaRouche’s Physical Economy vs. Clones of Soros and Schacht
-
In-Depth Paid
U.S. Presidential Election: Stunning Revolt Against the Establishment, But They Still Don’t Get It
-
weekly Paid
Ukraine’s ‘Molfar’ Hit List Puts Bullseye on J.D. Vance While Congress Pushes Back