In a speech at the Munich Security Conference, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken did not specify how the U.S. would define victory in Ukraine, emphasizing that outcomes legitimizing territorial seizures by force should be avoided. He left the stance on Crimea ambiguous, highlighting it as a decision for Ukraine. Blinken had previously indicated in a private meeting that Ukraine’s attempt to reclaim Crimea could provoke a significant Russian retaliation. The Western coalition’s unity was a central theme, with discussions on potential war outcomes. Ukraine’s Foreign Minister, Dmytro Kuleba, outlined his vision for a Ukrainian victory: restoration of territorial integrity, compensation for damages, and accountability for war crimes, emphasizing the need for a lasting peace ensuring Russia poses no future threat. Blinken criticized Russian cease-fire proposals as potentially strategic pauses for Russia to regroup, and cautioned against any military assistance or sanction evasion by China in support of Russia, saying that Washington “would view any provision of military assistance or evading sanctions as a very serious problem for us and for many other countries around the world.”
Strategic War Danger Public
In Munich Speech, Blinken Declines to Define Victory In Ukraine
About the author
Latest articles
Related coverage
-
Strategic War Danger Paid
Macron Declares at Submarine-launched Missile Test: ‘To Be Free, You Must Be Feared’
-
Strategic War Danger Paid
France To Begin Training Ukrainian Pilots on Rafale Fighter Jet
-
Strategic War Danger Paid
Houthis Escalate Attacks on Saudi Arabia, Hitting King Khalid Airport
-
Strategic War Danger Paid
Pentagon Orders CENTCOM to Prepare To Resume Major Combat against Iran