Skip to content

On the Issue of Struggling Against Neocolonial Practices

By His Excellency Ambassador Anatoly I. Antonov


Ambassador Anatoly I. Antonov, the Russian Federation Ambassador to the United States, offered the following article on July 11, for exclusive publication, to the Schiller Institute, Executive Intelligence Review (EIR) weekly magazine and its daily EIR.news. The ambassador refers to a “Russian initiative to create a new international anti-colonial movement, ‘For the Freedom of Nations!’ to eradicate modern practices of exploitation and hegemony.” EIR Editor-in-Chief Helga Zepp-LaRouche offers a short response to the ambassador in the context of the attempted assassination of former President Trump, which follows after his article.

July 11, 2024—Russia stands for the formation of a fairer and more stable multipolar system of international relations, based on the UN Charter and, above all, on the principle of sovereign equality of states. We advocate the emergence of a global order that will reflect the cultural and civilizational diversity of the modern world, and take into account the right of every nation to determine its own destiny.

This approach is gaining increasing support within the international community that seeks to eradicate vestiges of the colonial system.

Meanwhile, the collective West is still actively resisting such efforts, trying hard to retain the “reins of power” and the status of “master of destinies.” The current dynamic in Ukraine, and restless attempts by Western capitals to destabilize the situation in the post-Soviet space, are illustrative examples of the “global hegemon’s” desperate struggle to preserve its dominance and an opportunity to impose the unipolar model on the international community.

The world majority clearly understands that the Western colonial practices don’t lead to anything good. A bitter confirmation to this is the use of force by an aggressive minority under the leadership of the U.S. in a number of countries, including Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and some states in Asia and Africa. Experts estimate that since 1945, Washington has made more than 50 attempts at coups d’état and military interventions.

In the same line is the imposition of illegitimate economic barriers. These include limitation of opportunities for independent development, coercion to conclude unfair contracts, extracting resources for nothing, as well as relocation of dirty industries to countries of the South. Of special note is the unlawful practice of the West, aimed at unleashing sanctions pressure on the states that refuse to submit to the dictates and sacrifice their sovereignty and national identity. Examples of such illegal restrictive measures include the long-term economic blockade of Cuba, and unilateral restrictions against Iran and Venezuela.

In order to preserve their geopolitical presence in various regions of the world, Western capitals actively resort to the mechanisms of “debt neocolonialism.” Under the disguise of environmental protection and fight against climate change, they hypocritically promote the concepts of “green imperialism” which only benefit the so-called “golden billion.” The technological divide is being deliberately enhanced to consolidate the monopoly of Western IT corporations. There is a taboo on any publications contradicting the established Western narrative in the information space controlled by them.

An illustrative example is unequal distribution of vaccines during the COVID-19 [pandemic], with simultaneous Western efforts to artificially delay certification of the Russian Sputnik vaccine, which could save millions of lives in developing countries. At the same time, no one was held responsible for cases of severe side-effects from the use of hastily certified Western vaccines.

Another symptom of neocolonialism is the aggressive imposition of neoliberal attitudes to the detriment of traditional spiritual and moral values. It’s about pushing a destructive agenda, including gender diversity and legalization of drugs. Among other things, the so-called “summits for democracy” organized under the auspices of Washington in order to update the U.S. toolkit of external control and interference into the internal affairs of sovereign states, as well as the fight against those who are labeled here in the United States as “autocracies.”

These facts clearly point at who remains the true colonizer. It is high time for the Western camp, representing the minority, to understand the futility of imposing neocolonial practices (including the so-called “rules-based order”), and any attempts to lay the blame on someone else.

Based on the experience of our country in promoting the people’s liberation movements in the 1960s, nations of the world majority demonstrate their strong commitment to the struggle aimed at establishing an equal and mutually respectful dialogue. A vivid example of this is a disagreement of our partners representing the countries of the Global South and East with Western interpretations of the situation in Ukraine and their understanding of the goals and objectives of a special military operation.

In the same line is the support of the Russian initiative to create an international anti-colonial movement “For the Freedom of Nations!” to eradicate modern practices of exploitation and hegemony.

Subscribe now! One month free offer

EIR has been at the leading edge of independent media for 50 years. Founded by Lyndon LaRouche (1922– 2019) in 1974, EIR was created to be an independent intelligence journal capable of giving an accurate global assessment to those seeking to free the world from the grips of an oligarchical elite—whether that be local political organizers or high-level government officials. LaRouche insisted that “news” is not something you consume as a passive couch-potato or as entertainment to amuse you. Rather, a proper intelligence service should arm you with the knowledge, insights, and assessments needed to act on the political process yourself. 

Today, EIR’s Daily Alert provides you with a daily briefing on the most pressing political, economic, and cultural news, situated from the standpoint just described. Subscribers receive the “alert” newsletter every morning in their inbox, in addition to having access to all the material posted daily on the EIR.news website. Subscribers also get access to a portion of the in-depth articles published in the EIR weekly magazine, available in full for premium subscribers.

Try it for free and see how you like it. Cancel anytime.


‘We Must Revive the Art of Diplomacy!’

By Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Editor-in-Chief

July 16—The barely failed assassination attempt against now-Presidential candidate Donald Trump shocked the world into the reality of how fragile the international situation has become. It should be a wakeup call for all: We have no choice but to resort to diplomacy as a way of conflict resolution in the age of thermonuclear weapons. That means one always has to take into account the interest of the other—all others; that is the foremost lesson of the Peace of Westphalia, which ended 150 years of religious war in Europe. At that time the war parties agreed to sit down at the negotiating table. They realized that if the fighting were to continue, there soon would be nobody left alive to enjoy the victory. That is exactly the situation we are confronted with today.

The demonization of Russia is not working in the Global South, because it does not correspond to the experience of these countries, who represent the Global Majority by far. The recent NATO declaration claims that Russia and China represent a challenge to the Euro-Atlantic order. That declaration will be read as praise for these two countries in the Global South, because those NATO countries are regarded, by what were formerly called the developing countries, as the forces still carrying out a continuing neocolonial policy.

It is not too late to resolve the most dangerous strategic situation the world has ever experienced. President Putin’s offer for a new Eurasian Security Order should find a positive response in the West, and should be even expanded into a new global security and development architecture, taking into account the interest of every single country on the planet.