Skip to content

Diane Sare et al. v. Rockland County Board of Elections Case Filed in NY Supreme Court

On Dec 16, the Rockland County New York Board of Elections was served notice that a lawsuit has been filed with the New York State Supreme Court in regard to the posted results of the November 5 General Election. Plaintiffs Diane Sare, Adam Mocio, Mark Murphy and Smart Legislation (an election integrity non-profit) are demanding a hand recount of the paper ballots which were scanned by computers to generate the questionable results. They are also demanding that the U.S. Presidential and U.S. Senatorial election be redone in the county due to an abnormal drop-off of votes between presidential candidates and senate candidates by party.

In the case of the LaRouche Party candidate Diane Sare, her overall vote was under 0.3% in the county. In 2022, Sare had received 5.8% or 6,212 votes as reported on election night, but by morning her official vote total had been reduced to 277, or 0.2%. The Board of Elections offered no explanation for this. In 2024, Sare’s reported vote remained at 0.29% throughout the night.

Reportedly, Sare received a mere 0-5 votes per election district, including in her own home district, where she supposedly had only five votes. Since she knew of three votes just in her own household and another from a neighbor, Sare decided to work with a volunteer to make a short canvass of voters on her street. Sare quickly located four more (for a total of seven), of whom three were willing to sign a sworn statement that they had voted for her. Thus, six voters were already willing to step forward. After another short walk down another street, Sare located two more voters. In the suit, Sare filed exhibits showing statements from eight sworn voters in her home district, against an official count of only five; in another district, four sworn voters came forward against an official count of three. The existence of such discrepancies in a district in which less than 3% of voters were even interviewed, constitutes grounds for a hand recount in front of witnesses.

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe

Already have an account? Sign In