Skip to content

EIR Daily News • Sunday, January 26, 2025

The LaRouche Organization President Diane Sare asks why should people listen to intelligence professionals who lie all the time? Credit: EIRNS/Yuriy Zah

The Lead

Crush the Liars' Bureau To Unlock Development

by Jason Ross (EIRNS) — Jan. 25, 2025

Next week will see confirmation hearings for Kash Patel, President Trump’s nominee to head the FBI, and Tulsi Gabbard, whom he has tapped to be the Director of National Intelligence. The fight, especially around Gabbard, is intense! The National Review saw fit to publish a truly hysterical editorial urging Republican senators to vote against her. Donald Trump, Jr., defended her on X, by sharing an article in her defense and saying that “Any Republican Senator who votes against @TulsiGabbard deserves a primary.”

The LaRouche Organization has circulated—in Washington, D.C., and around the U.S.—a report on the forces opposed to the oversight that Gabbard and Patel would provide. In her introductory letter to “The Liars’ Bureau,” The LaRouche Organization President Diane Sare asks of the intelligence “leaders” who lied again and again, and who now oppose Gabbard and Patel, “Why on earth would you listen to any of these people, whose lies have literally killed thousands of Americans, and irreparably harmed or even ended the lives of millions of people around the world…?”

In light of executive orders on ending the weaponization of the federal government and defending free speech, Scott Ritter is calling on President Trump to shut down the hit lists maintained by the Ukrainian Center for Countering Disinformation and Myrotvorets, on which Ritter, Tulsi Gabbard, and Tucker Carlson appear. Does Trump believe that “coordination between the U.S. State Department, the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Justice, together with the U.S. intelligence community, using permanent staff or contracted proxies, and the Ukrainian government which resulted in the creation and maintenance of several lists—including one which, with the support of the U.S. State Department, labeled U.S. citizens as ‘information terrorists’ requiring summary justice (i.e., death), and another which did not shield its role as a de facto ‘hit list,’ violates the new orders insofar as federal resources were involved in facilitating work designed to punish U.S. citizens with the ultimate sanction—death—for the ‘crime’ of exercising their right of free speech.”

Breaking apart “The Liars’ Bureau” will allow a true catharsis for the United States, a meaningful reckoning with the “assassination bureau” that has used terror to prevent challenges to the imperial policy that has come to dominate U.S. thought since the death of FDR and certainly since the assassination of JFK. The pinnacle of such efforts will be the exoneration of Lyndon LaRouche—freeing the U.S. to benefit from his legacy.

But back to the present for a moment.

One of Trump’s main domestic issues—immigration—is running into difficulties. His call to end birthright citizenship was ruled unconstitutional essentially immediately by a federal judge, and his policy seems plainly to run contrary to the 6-2 decision in the 1898 Supreme Court Case United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which held that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese parents was indeed a U.S. citizen.

On Jan. 21, Trump held an event in the White House to announce planned investment into the “Stargate” project, which foresees investing up to $500 billion in a half-dozen machine learning data centers to ensure the U.S. has what Trump called “the physical and virtual infrastructure to power the next generation of AI.” But his announcement was upstaged by DeepSeek, a Chinese company that has released a large language model as good as anything by OpenAI, at a fraction of the price and, reportedly, the computing power.

Meanwhile, he has struck two powerful blows against the green ideology that is suffocating potential economic growth: withdrawing from the Paris climate accord and taming the requirements for environmental impact statements that are used to delay, if not prevent entirely, projects of potential value.

A resolution of the fighting in Ukraine, an abandonment of the policy for war on Iran, and an end to the attempts to hinder China’s growth—these necessary steps are of a piece with adopting a truly positive policy, a renaissance of infrastructure, science, and cooperative development. Fusion power, continental-scale water transfer, new transportation networks—these could be our future, rather than war.

The Schiller Institute’s report “Development Drive Means Billions of New Jobs, No Refugees, No War” points the way forward.

In-Depth

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe

Already have an account? Sign In