On Friday, July 25, Russian Presidential advisor Nikolai Patrushev warned that London was prepared to stage a false-flag operation to sabotage ongoing efforts by U.S. President Trump to end the conflict in Ukraine: “If necessary, London would easily stab Washington in the back. I believe officials in the White House realize what kind of ‘ally’ they are dealing with.”
Preceding this warning, on June 16, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service issued a statement describing the British intelligence hand in Ukraine and outlined a scenario in which a false-flag Russian torpedo attack is carried out against a U.S. Navy ship in the Baltic. “Kiev has become the perfect executor of vile provocations and terrorist acts for Perfidious Albion,” the statement said.
To what end? There is no other answer than nuclear World War III. For the astute, it should come as no surprise that Perfidious Albion would rather “reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven.”
Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russian Deputy Representative at the UN, at a UN Security Council briefing on Ukraine on July 25 called by the U.K. and other nations, blasted the hypocrisy of the West’s professed concern about humanitarian issues in Ukraine: “So why did we convene today’s meeting, if not to discuss the issues I’ve just mentioned? As it turns out, once again, it was only to artificially keep the Ukrainian file afloat at the Security Council, especially amidst the ongoing carnage and humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, about which our Western colleagues are much less eloquent.”
That situation in Gaza, described, not inaccurately, by many around the world as a “humanitarian catastrophe,” is much more than that. It is the place where at this moment, humankind is losing its humanity and its moral fitness to survive by being unable, or, in the case of the most important players, unwilling, to stop a horrific and publicly broadcast genocide.
We are fortunate that history, when we are acting truly human, is a creative process; as such, the future does not emerge as an aggregate of past events, but only as an intervention by those with a vision of an entirely different kind of future which interrupts and reroutes the course of the current events. This is the only way that the seemingly inexorable momentum of British imperial policy of war and famine could be stopped today.
Helga Zepp-LaRouche laid out just such a vision in remarks to the 112th meeting of the International Peace Coalition on Friday, July 25th:
“In a certain sense, is it not the natural right of people to have the fullest development of their potential as a human being? Is it not the right of every newborn child to have access to food, health, education? If we would overcome this under-development and poverty, every child would have the chance for universal education.
“My dream is that mankind would really become adult—meaning that a lot of the diseases we see, in terms of greed, violence, all these perversions of various kinds—we would grow out of these, and people would discover that their mind is the most beautiful and most important, and their soul is what needs to be developed and educated.
“Now, if everybody would have the chance materially as a precondition to do that, and unfold our potential this way, the human species would become so much more interesting, loving, creative. I think if we now think our lives are of a limited duration and what we have to do is to make sure that we get humanity into that other era, I think that then we can really make a miracle. I agree that the next months will be decisive, but I think they will be decisive in much more fundamental ways because this present system cannot continue in the same way, like the Ukraine war cannot continue. You cannot replace the lack of soldiers in Ukraine with missiles. You can send in as many Taurus missiles as you want; it doesn’t solve the basic problem that the war is being lost by a war of attrition. In the same way, there are other exhaust processes where we are coming to a complete break. Either we move humanity into this new era, or we maybe will not exist.
“I think people have to take that very much as a personal matter.”
