This article was written to appear in EIR's February 2026 Special Report, The Empire Has No Clothes: The End of Oligarchy, Not Just Epstein.
Stories have increasingly surfaced out of the Maxwell/Epstein files’ several-millions-documents release, regarding bizarre medical experiments reminiscent of those carried out by the Nazi doctors tried at Nuremberg for crimes against humanity. These tales, including courtroom accounts of victims “treated” at Jeffrey Epstein’s New Mexico “Zorro” ranch have been among the most unsettling revelations. The ranch is only now being searched, despite Epstein himself having been arrested in July of 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges and jailed in New York.
The enablers of Epstein, including scores of personalities involved in science and technology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard, Stanford Research Institute and other prestigious locations, are guilty of extensive involvement with, and propitiation of him. These enablers had him lecture and even direct seminars in some cases. That the semi-literate Epstein had a private office at Harvard University—to which Epstein gave $9 million, $6.5 million of which endowed Harvard’s “Program for Evolutionary Dynamics” in 2003—speaks volumes. The Epstein-Maxwell files recently yielded a 2016 photo of that program’s director, evolutionary biologist Martin Nowak, Jeffrey Epstein, and Steve Bannon. Bannon was then the director of Donald Trump’s MAGA movement.
From those same files has also recently emerged a discussion between Bannon and Epstein, in which Bannon states that, because of U.S. President Donald Trump’s erratic behavior, the 25th Amendment might soon have to be invoked against the President!
On July 31, 2019, The New York Times reported that Epstein wanted to “spread his seed” over generations, as have several other newspapers. This was to be done by cryogenically freezing various of his body parts, presumably to have them available, at some later date, to fulfill the dubious demand for—or Epstein’s command to fruitfully multiply: a sort of reverse necrophilia. This virtual copulation, need not necessarily be with a human, however. Perhaps, this Frankenstein-like project would be accomplished with the aid of one or several “transhumans” presumably designed to be superior to the majority of Epstein’s inferiors in the human race.
Though this would correctly seem to most people to be conclusive evidence that the proponent of such ideas had crossed the border at the edge of sanity into the “twilight zone,” Epstein’s mad conceit reveals a broader phenomenon that has often been entertained by collapsing societies, which should have known better. Such notions, recently much amplified by widely tolerated, Covid-accelerated “recreational” drug usage by three or more generations of European and American “elites,” have attained great significance, if not yet dominance, among the trans-Atlantic “elite” in the past four decades.
More than four decades ago, during the 1983 Boston mayoral campaign, the candidate associated with Lyndon LaRouche, Michael Gelber, along with his associates, pointed out that “Before Hitler, there was Harvard.” It was the 1922 book, The Revolt Against Civilization: The Menace of the Under-Man, written by “Harvard man” and American Eugenics Society member Lothrop Stoddard, which anticipated the later Nazi use of the term “Untermenschen.” Stoddard, who visited Germany in the first days of World War II, was welcomed by the Nazis and had a brief audience with Adolf Hitler.
Let there be no mistake. The weird, so-called progressive right, “new eugenics” theories of the PayPal Mafia cronies of Jeffrey Epstein and the Robert Maxwell family are not only resurrecting, but surpassing the criminal ideas and practices of 100 years ago.
Consider this passage from the 2022 article, “From Public Eugenics to Private Eugenics: What Does the Future Hold?”
“Traditional public eugenics, which was ordered by the State, has been replaced by a kind of private eugenics conducted by parents using reproductive techniques, genetic testing and, eventually in the future, genetic engineering. While traditional eugenics strived to improve the species, the new model aims to satisfy parents’ reproductive aspirations. The association between public and private eugenics is an ongoing issue, mostly due to its relation to nazi eugenics.” (Emphases added.)
Understand what is being proposed here. If the association of eugenics with Nazi race science could be broken, by operating through private eugenics farms—such as Epstein’s New Mexico “baby factory,” where his intention was to impregnate 20 or more women at a time, to “spread his seed” and that of other superior types—such a “privatized eugenics” could be carried out in privatized, corporate cities, in “cyber company towns.” Consent to such procedures might be made as easy as “agreeing” to a contract modeled on those which Americans regularly sign when presented with cell phone updates—contracts which are designed, not to be read, but rubber-stamped. This would be a “brave new world,” indeed.
Think of the Epstein New Mexico ranch, and then recall the opening sentences of Aldous Huxley’s eponymous 1932 novel Brave New World. “A squat, gray building of only 34 stories. Over the main entrance, the words, Central London Hatchery and Conditioning Center, and, in a shield, the World State’s motto, Community, Identity, Stability.… ‘And this,’ said the Director, opening the door, ‘is the fertilizing room.’ ” Huxley’s novel is set in two locations—London, and New Mexico.
Are the young girls and children (including young boys) victimized, and perhaps even murdered in these “procedures,” many of them from poor or struggling families, and some of them now missing, viewed by the “Epstein Class” perpetrators, not as victims, but as particularly lucky “human guinea pigs?” On what basis are they selected? Is there a set of peculiarly desirable traits which makes them “biologically fit” to be impregnated, in various ways, actively or passively by the self-proclaimed “most intelligent” men (and women)? Are they “destined,” and by whom, to rule humanity in the near future on behalf of a trans-Atlantic “golden billion,” while the other seven billion people are disregarded as redundant, as lives not worthy to be lived?
“Unless we can totally re-engineer DNA to change what a human being is, there are many people who should not live in a modern way, but in a traditional way. And that is a level of revolution that is so far beyond anything that the Trump-Vance regime is doing,” the new Trotsky of “right-wing progressives,” Curtis Yarvin, told The New Yorker last year. What he means by “traditional living” is indicated by his views of the 1861 American War to Save the Republic, which he refers to as “The War of the Southern Secession.” Yarvin, once a “hippie liberal” has asserted:
“It is very difficult to argue that the war of succession made anyone’s life more pleasant, including that of freed slaves.”
This same Yarvin is a close confidant of Palantir’s Peter Thiel, who notoriously said in his 2009 essay “The Education of a Libertarian,” “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.” In response to a question regarding the propriety of his relationship with Yarvin, he said, “How dangerous is it that we are being linked? One reassuring thought: one of our hidden advantages is that these people wouldn’t believe in a conspiracy if it hit them over the head.”
Yarvin and his supporters are acolytes of the much-too-popular French racist novelist Renaud Camus, author of The Great Replacement: Introduction to Global Replacism. The notion that there is a liberal elite that seeks to replace “white Christian civilization” by flooding Europe with Africans and Asians—what is euphemistically called “the immigration problem”—is a re-booting of Lothrop Stoddard’s The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy released in 1920 and a central influence in the battle to restrict immigration. (This resulted in the 1924 Immigration Act, restricting new immigration of persons of a given nationality or ethnicity, to only 2% of the respective numbers that were already in the United States, thus restricting anyone from Asia from entering at all.)
In a July 1, 2025 article titled “Beware the New Eugenics,” author Joel Kotkin wrote:
The techno-elite’s vision constitutes a call for a scientifically ordered society detached from marriage, family, religion, and the broad sense of community. In its most extreme form, the eugenicists embrace ‘transhumanism’ like Thiel—searching for extended mortality through technology. Today, we witness Silicon Valley’s obsession with efforts to extend life through the use of drugs, technology, and rigorous exercise, a kind of techno-Spartacism lacking that culture’s strong sense of communal obligation and honor. But this is just the beginning.
The characterization of the Silicon Valley eugenicists as seeking to erect a Sparta—a society devoted to needless war—but devoid of loyalty or honor— is to the point, and also explains why these pro-transhumans, or humanoids, prefer machines to people. Machines require no such human traits, including love of country, family or culture. Machines don’t pledge “their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor” to causes.
It’s past time to shut down the “New Eugenics” which is the same as the old eugenics, just with more money, more spin, and less literacy. Use the Epstein-Maxwell file dump, to pry open the Silicon Valley-sponsored crypt of post-Nazi Nazi experimentation that Epstein, and others funded. Theirs is a mad and already-failed attempt to stop what their own predatory, Malthusian financial policies have accomplished in the United States and Western Europe—namely, a disastrous negative population growth rate, with its accompanying “Epstein lifestyle.” American eugenicist Madison Grant in 1916 called it “The Passing of the Great Race.” But racism is never great, and there is only one race—the human race, whose greatness is seen in its commitment to use human creativity for the benefit of all.
