On Sept. 14, the U.S. State Department and the U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office issued a joint statement summarizing Secretary of State Tony Blinken and Foreign Secretary David Lammy’s talks on Sept. 10-11 in London, under the auspices of the first “U.S.-U.K. Strategic Dialogue.” That Dialogue “celebrates and deepens the long-standing and special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom,” the statement asserts—a treasonous “Special Relationship,” in point of fact, which Winston Churchill set into motion to reconquer the United States for the British Empire.
The joint statement assumes that the “Special Relationship” shall rule the world. “The United States and United Kingdom emphasized the interconnectedness of the security and economies of the Euro-Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific,” it asserts. While mobilizing military and financial resources for Ukraine’s war against Russia is their first priority, they also “pledged to explore new opportunities to coordinate approaches” in the Indo-Pacific, building upon the AUKUS nuclear project and capitalizing on disputes they have fostered between the Philippines and China. Support for their two other lead proxies for Anglo-American war, Israel and Taiwan, is reiterated. Intensified campaigns to destabilize Europe were signaled, as “they decided to work together to support the European and Euro-Atlantic integration of Ukraine, Moldova, and the Western Balkans, highlighting Ukraine’s irreversible path to NATO membership.” The two discussed U.S.-U.K. “shared priorities in Africa,” about which little is said except for dubious concerns about Sudan and Somalia.
Two operations discussed merit more mention. The first, the allegations ("intelligence findings") that Iran has supplied Russia with ballistic missiles. The two promised to “take coordinated action” against Russia and Iran, and get other “international partners” to join in. This the G7 nations dutifully complied with on Sept. 14. This was accompanied by a transparent attempt to turn attention away from Netanyahu’s genocide against Palestine, by labeling Iran the primary threat to stability and security in Southwest Asia. Most ominous, “both agreed that Iran’s nuclear program had never been more advanced and posed a clear threat to regional and global peace and security,” a statement which is music to those in nuclear-armed Israel who are itching to strike Iran—so long as they can be assured of American and British backing.
