Published on Nov. 21, the same day that Russia unveiled its game-changer Oreshnik hypersonic missile in a strike against Ukraine, the New York Times ran an article which was phenomenally delusional, even by the Times’ standards. It proposed that the best way to bring peace to Ukraine is to either a) invite them to join NATO right now; or b) “several [Biden administration] officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications.”
Strategic War Danger Paid
New York Times Strings Together the Worst Imaginable Proposals for Ukraine
About the author
Latest articles
-
Daily Alert: Violence Erupts As Paradigms Collide
-
Trump Unilaterally Declares 'Energy Ceasefire' As Washington Presses Kiev on Refinery Strikes
-
Student-Organized Pro-Lula Rally Fills São Paulo's Largest Avenue, as President's Supporters Attempt Comeback in Second Round of Elections
-
Britain's Defense Minister Slams Trump-Russia Diesel Deal
Related coverage
-
Strategic War Danger Paid
London Warns Russia Preparing to Assassinate Europe's Arms Executives
-
Strategic War Danger Paid
The Hormuz Tanker War Continues
-
Strategic War Danger
Houthis Strike Riyadh Airport as Fighting Heats Up
-
Strategic War Danger Paid
Zelensky Blows a Gasket, Trump Calls for His Ouster, Miami U.S.-Ukraine Talks Collapse