London’s The Economist is bubbling over with excitement about what the new year will bring and what strife its British imperial ownership can foist upon humanity. In a Dec. 29 article, they mention seven conflicts that could “explode” into regional or global disasters: “China v. Taiwan, India v. Pakistan, Russia v. Ukraine, Israel v. Hamas, Congo v. Rwanda, Sudan, and Venezuela.”
In a second article, The Economist gloats over the lack of unity among Americans, and says that a planned Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) brawl, to occur on the White House grounds in June, is an appropriate metaphor for the state of the American population.
When the British write such things, as with Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, one must understand that they are not necessarily describing reality, but rather the outcome that they intend to bring into being.
Consider in that context the terror attack launched by Ukraine on a New Year’s party in Kherson, which killed at least two dozen civilians, following on the heels of a Ukrainian attempt to assassinate President Putin by sending 91 drones toward his Valdai residence while Zelenskyy was meeting with President Trump in Florida, and just prior to a phone call between Presidents Trump and Putin. This assassination attempt has been disputed by an “unnamed” source at the CIA, and possibly by CIA Director Ratcliffe, causing Trump to post on Truth Social that Putin’s “‘attack’ bluster shows that Russia is the one standing in the way of peace.” Meanwhile, the Russian Defense Ministry presented the American Military Attaché to Moscow with the recovered drone “guidance module,” which indicates what the target actually was (Putin’s Valdai residence), and who programmed it, which former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter says was the CIA.
In response to the (Wall Street Journal} article citing an “unnamed” CIA source that there was no assassination attempt against Putin, Ritter posted in his Telegram Channel: @*& “The CIA says an attack took place. They just obfuscate by saying it was against a military target near Putin’s residence. The Russians have the radar tracks. And the targeting data from the debris. Moreover it’s the CIA that is behind these attacks. They have to deny.”
Since the Russians have turned over the guidance module to the United States through official channels, President Trump, rather than accusing President Putin of “blustering” about an assassination attempt, should demand a full investigation, and hold accountable anyone who is lying, especially if it is his own CIA Director John Ratcliffe. Does President Trump want to be known as the President who couldn’t control his own appointees? If it was all done by the British, that “special relationship” should be ended for once and for all. In fact, that “special relationship” should be ended regardless. The President must understand that whatever is said by the CIA and/or the lying news media, President Putin knows the truth about what occurred, and this will necessarily affect the relationship between Russia and the United States, not to mention jeopardize global security..
The billionaire lackeys of the British imperial system cannot allow the people of the United States to remember the “causes which impell[ed] them to the separation” from the British Empire, but are working overtime to persuade the American people and their President that the “enemy” is everyone else, maybe Russia, or China, or some guy on a boat in the Caribbean.
This is nonsense!
The only dangerous adversary of the United States is what it has always been, the British liberal system, and the depraved, bestial culture that goes along with it. In that sense, by capitulating to the degraded view that man is moved by force, rather than reason, we become our own worst enemy. Let us revive the American tradition of rejecting British bestiality with an intense study of the works of Leibniz and LaRouche!
