The Group of Seven, at the conclusion of their summit today in Cornwall, U.K., released, in addition to their 25-page joint communiqué, a 4-page “G7 2030 Nature Compact.” It states that “Through this Compact, we commit to supporting global consensus and to taking bold action for delivery of ambitious outcomes for nature in 2021 at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) COP15 in Kunming and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) COP26 in Glasgow in particular…. Throughout the next decade, we will each mobilize on a whole-of-government basis to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, with action across four core pillars: (1) transition; (2) investment; (3) conservation; and (4) accountability.”
The idea is that, in the name of protecting nature, mankind’s achievements and production of the means to life are to be rolled back. The Compact reflects the fact that last year’s “Great Reset” terminology has been dumped, as too hot. The current euphemism for the green transition (to mass death) speaks of “nature-positive” policies, e.g. “our world must become not only net zero, but also nature positive.” Today’s other chosen term is “nature-based solutions”—NBS, better understood as Nazi-based solutions. The term “nature-based solutions” was first coined in an article by Dr. Hilde Eggermont et al. of the Belgian Biodiversity Platform at the Royal Belgian Institute for Natural Sciences in 2015.
Some of the more notable agreements (although not fundamentally new) within the Compact include:
Accelerate the transition to “sustainable and climate resilient agriculture.”
Over the next five years, to increasingly “account for nature in economic and financial planning and decision-making.”
