On Feb. 10, Tucker Carlson aired a hard-hitting interview with Colonel Daniel Davis (ret.)interview with Colonel Daniel Davis (ret.), which he also posted on his X account. He headlined the interview, “Ukraine Is Selling American Weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels. Col. Daniel Davis on How To Stop It.”
In the interview sectioninterview section which starts at 31:16, Carlson emphasized: “Fact is—not guess, but fact—the Ukrainian military is selling a huge percentage, up to half of the arms that we send them, half! And I’m not guessing about this. I know that for a fact, not speculation. And they’re selling it, and a lot of it is winding up in the drug cartels on our border. So this is a crime, what’s happening. Our intel agencies are fully aware of this. You tell me, they’re not profiting from this. Of course, you think the CIA is not profiting from this? Yes, they are. I can’t prove that, but I believe that. … We’re sending these arms to Ukraine, hundreds of billions of dollars, and it’s being stolen and sold to our actual enemies,” he stressed.
Carlson had stated earlier, “[T]he Ukrainian military is selling about half of the arms they get from the United States into international black markets, and they are winding up, in some cases, in the drug cartels in Latin America…. That’s a fact. And you can buy them. And I spoke to someone who did buy some [weapons], actually.”
He later affirmed, “They’re selling weapons to drug cartels. This is a nightmare…. You think the New York Times doesn’t know that? I don’t think so….” As well, Carlson averred, “They’re assassinating people. Again, I’m not speculating about this. I know.”
From the context of Carlson’s remarks, it is fairly clear that Carlson recorded the interview during the last weeks of the Biden administration. Whenever it was recorded, it is significant that Carlson would post the interview on Feb. 10, during a time that Trump is trying to force the neo-Nazi Zelenskyy regime to the negotiating table. In addition, if Carlson can provide substantiation to even a portion of his charges, it would bring to light the British-American intelligence services that direct murderous policy for the United States, and might even “name the names” for later trial of the perpetrators, in the context of cleaning out the (In)Justice Department.
