In a TikTok statement posted June 7 which has 12,000 views, 1,000 likes, and scores of comments—The LaRouche Organization President Diane Sare, in response to FBI Director Kash Patel’s June 6 interview on Joe Rogan, where he spoke about going after the Russiagate apparatus, told viewers that more important would be to investigate the case of the dirty operations done to silence eight-time presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche.
Sare thoroughly explained the job that was done against LaRouche and his associates: the attempted assassination of LaRouche at his home in an October 6, 1986 raid that included 400 armed U.S. Marshals, FBI agents, and State Troopers; the indictment of LaRouche by “Russiagate’s” head-prosecutor Robert Mueller; the guilty verdicts found by judges and juries that were in bed with the military industrial complex; and the jail sentences given to LaRouche and some of his associates ranging from 3 to 77 years.
They wanted to silence LaRouche because he was organizing in the United States, and in collaboration with world leaders, to reorganize the financial system, wresting it out of the control of criminally-intent institutions; he was also a back-channel negotiator working to end the Cold War. The results today are that hearing the name “LaRouche” leaves a bad taste in some mouths—though “he’s a bad guy, but we can’t say why.”
Sare praised Patel’s efforts to investigate the “Russiagate” operation run against President Donald Trump, and encouraged prosecution of individuals involved, because that operation had devastating consequences, including putting us in danger of thermonuclear war between two nuclear weapons superpowers.
However, Sare said the case of LaRouche is more significant, because, as she concludes her TikTok, “if we were to pursue what happened to Lyndon LaRouche, we would get a treasure-trove of dirty operations which have made it impossible for truly qualified people to run for federal office in this country.” She said President Trump’s desire for peace with Russia and China is enough to unleash this apparatus against him. “The LaRouche case is the precedent that would allow you to get at all of that.”
